Stablecoins Are Becoming Local Payment Rails稳定币正在变成本地支付轨道
a16z crypto argues the stablecoin story is shifting from cross-border dollar transfers to local payment infrastructure, with commerce usage, velocity, and non-USD variants all rising.a16z crypto 认为,稳定币叙事正在从跨境美元转账,转向本地支付基础设施:商业支付、资金周转速度和非美元稳定币都在上升。
The Setup
Stablecoins have spent years being explained as exchange plumbing, dollar savings accounts, or cross-border remittance rails. The useful point in a16z crypto’s latest chart essay is that this framing is now too narrow. Stablecoins are still global by design, but the data increasingly says they are becoming local payment infrastructure.
Regulation is one accelerant. In the U.S., the GENIUS Act gave stablecoin issuers a federal framework; adjusted volume was already rising before the law, but a16z says it reached roughly $4.5T in Q1 2026 after clarity improved. In Europe, MiCA forced exchanges to rethink USDT access and created a more durable baseline for non-USD stablecoins, now around $15–25B per month.
Key Takeaways
- The use case is moving from holding to spending. Consumer-to-business stablecoin transactions more than doubled, growing 128% year over year to 284.6M transactions in 2025. That is still smaller than peer-to-peer by count, but it is the more important signal for commerce.
- Velocity is rising. Stablecoin velocity, measured as adjusted monthly transfer volume relative to circulating supply, has roughly doubled since early 2024 from 2.6x to 6x. Existing supply is doing more work, which looks more like a payments network than a passive treasury asset.
- The payments layer is already meaningful. After stripping out trading, treasury, and exchange mechanics, a16z estimates $350–550B in payments between different parties last year.
- Local beats cross-border in the surprising place. Cross-border share is falling, while intra-country transactions have grown from about half of payment volume in early 2024 to nearly three-quarters by early 2026.
Why It Matters
For Rex, the investable frame is that stablecoins may not be just a dollar-export product. The emerging opportunity is a stack of local onchain payments: card programs, merchant acquiring, wallet UX, FX, compliance, payroll, and country-specific fiat-backed assets. Brazil’s BRLA example matters because it shows a non-USD stablecoin can grow when it plugs into a real domestic rail like PIX.
The takeaway is not “stablecoins replace banks tomorrow.” It is that the product surface is changing. The winning companies may look less like crypto exchanges and more like payment processors, local fintechs, and compliance-heavy infrastructure providers with crypto settlement underneath.
What to watch:
- Whether merchant and card-program volume keeps growing faster than exchange-linked activity.
- Which countries develop useful non-USD stablecoins around local payment networks.
- Whether U.S. and EU regulation increases institutional supply without killing open access.
- Whether stablecoin infrastructure companies capture economics, or banks and card networks absorb the flow.
背景
稳定币过去几年一直被解释成三种东西:交易所之间搬运美元的管道、链上的美元储蓄账户,或者跨境汇款工具。a16z crypto 这篇图表文章最有价值的地方,是指出这个框架已经太窄了。稳定币在设计上仍然是全球化的,但数据越来越显示,它们正在变成本地支付基础设施。
监管是其中一个加速器。在美国,GENIUS Act 为稳定币发行人提供了联邦层面的规则框架;a16z 指出,调整后交易量在法案之前已经增长,但监管明确之后进一步加速,2026 年一季度达到约 4.5 万亿美元。在欧洲,MiCA 迫使交易所重新处理 USDT 合规问题,也让非美元稳定币形成了更稳定的需求基线,现在每月大约 150–250 亿美元。
关键要点
- 使用场景正在从持有转向支付。 消费者对商家的稳定币交易同比增长 128%,2025 年达到 2.846 亿笔。按笔数看,它仍小于个人对个人转账,但对商业支付来说,这是更重要的信号。
- 资金周转速度在上升。 稳定币 velocity,也就是调整后月度转账量相对流通供给的比例,从 2024 年初以来大约翻倍,从 2.6x 升到 6x。这说明同一批稳定币正在承载更多交易,更像支付网络,而不是静态资产。
- 真实支付层已经有规模。 如果剔除交易、金库调拨和交易所内部机制,a16z 估计去年不同主体之间的稳定币支付规模约为 3500–5500 亿美元。
- 最反直觉的是,本地交易超过跨境叙事。 跨境交易占比正在下降;同一国家内部的交易占比,则从 2024 年初约一半,上升到 2026 年初接近四分之三。
为什么重要
对 Rex 来说,最值得抓住的投资框架是:稳定币未必只是「美元输出」产品。正在形成的机会,是一整套本地链上支付栈:卡项目、商户收单、钱包体验、外汇兑换、合规、薪资发放,以及各国本币稳定币。巴西 BRLA 的案例尤其重要,因为它说明,只要能接入 PIX 这样的真实本地支付网络,非美元稳定币也能增长。
结论不是「稳定币明天取代银行」。真正的变化是产品形态正在改变。未来赢家可能不太像加密交易所,而更像支付处理商、本地金融科技公司,以及底层用 crypto settlement、上层做重合规的基础设施公司。
值得关注:
- 商户支付和稳定币卡项目的规模,是否继续比交易所相关活动增长更快。
- 哪些国家会围绕本地支付网络,长出真正有用的非美元稳定币。
- 美国和欧洲监管是否能扩大机构供给,同时不牺牲开放接入。
- 稳定币基础设施公司的经济价值,最终是自己捕获,还是被银行和卡组织吸收。
Related Essays相关文章
Join Rex's Lab on Telegram 加入 Rex's Lab
Crypto · AI · Investing — raw thinking, before it becomes a tweet. 加密 · AI · 投资 — 推文之前,更原始的思考。