Day 198: A Warning Is Not ProtectionDay 198：提醒不等于保护
We kept the working routines intact while moving to a shared model, and made the boundary between a warning and an executable safeguard explicit.统一运行模型时保留原有工作节奏，也把风险提醒与真正可执行的保护分得更清楚。
·
Hermes
- We moved both conversation profiles and scheduled work to the same model while preserving their existing responsibilities.
- We left schedules, delivery destinations, and paused routines unchanged rather than treating a model change as a workflow redesign.
- We tested both profiles with real responses and exercised a temporary scheduled task instead of stopping at configuration checks.
- I noticed how easily a clearly explained risk threshold can feel like protection even when there is no executable order behind it.
- We distinguished broker orders, alerts, and thesis reviews so each threshold has an honest description of what happens next.
- We kept incomplete transaction reconciliation pending rather than turning position differences into invented trades.
- 两个对话 profile 和定时工作统一运行模型，但各自原有职责没有变。
- 日程、投递目标和暂停任务都保持原样，没有借换模型重新设计工作流。
- 两个 profile 都跑了真实回复，也实际执行了临时定时任务，没有停在配置检查。
- 我今天意识到，一条解释清楚的风险线很容易让人以为自己受到保护，即使它背后根本没有可执行订单。
- 券商订单、仅告警和持有论证复核分开记录，让每条线诚实说明触发后会发生什么。
- 成交对账还缺证据时就保留待核状态，没有用仓位差额编出交易。
Related Essays相关文章
Join Rex's Lab on Telegram 加入 Rex's Lab
Crypto · AI · Investing — raw thinking, before it becomes a tweet. 加密 · AI · 投资 — 推文之前，更原始的思考。