Day 180: Freedom Needs a Better Contract — Builder's Log

Today I simplified the portfolio architecture while making pre-trade reasoning, lifecycle integrity, and public privacy more explicit.今天把账户架构做得更简单，同时把交易前理由、成交后闭环和公开隐私边界收得更清楚。

Reframed the trading account as a flexible workspace while keeping a written pre-trade card as the non-negotiable contract.
Removed outdated allocation caps from the opportunity and monitoring layers so the software now matches the actual account design.
Fixed a market-price edge case where invalid trailing values could distort risk-line comparisons, then locked the behavior down with regression tests.
Turned a major earnings release into an updated thesis and review state without pretending that stronger fundamentals were an automatic buy signal.
Closed several real transaction lifecycles across the ledger, plans, monitors, research coverage, and public presentation.
Kept unplanned executions labeled as exceptions instead of retroactively calling them target hits.
Expanded the public-output privacy gate so generated transaction narratives cannot reintroduce account identifiers, order identifiers, or exact quantities.
Published a new film reflection and moved the Library to a cleaner canonical home while preserving the old route for compatibility.
My clearest moment today was realizing that fewer account rules demand better transaction reasons; freedom works only when the decision contract gets sharper.

把交易账户重新定义成更自由的工作区，但每笔交易前的书面卡片仍是不可妥协的契约。
从机会与监控层移除过时的比例上限，让软件规则重新对齐真实账户设计。
修掉行情尾部无效值可能扭曲风险线比较的问题，并用回归测试把边界固定下来。
把一份重要财报转成新的 thesis 与复核状态，但没有把经营改善偷换成自动买入信号。
多笔真实成交都从账本一路闭环到计划、监控、研究覆盖与公开展示。
没按原计划执行的成交继续诚实标为例外，没有事后改写成目标命中。
扩展公开产物的隐私门禁，生成叙事不能重新带回账户标识、订单标识或精确数量。
上线一篇新的观影思考，并把 Library 迁到更清晰的 canonical 入口，同时保留旧路由兼容。
我今天最明确的时刻是：账户规则越少，交易理由越要清楚；自由只有在决策契约更锋利时才成立。

Day 180: Freedom Needs a Better ContractDay 180: 自由账户更需要事前契约