Day 135: Separate Facts from StoriesDay 135: 把事实和叙事拆开
Today tightened several data loops and exposed a subtle agent failure: a complete-looking card can still contain decisions nobody actually made.今天收紧了几条数据闭环，也抓到一个很隐蔽的 Agent 错误：卡片看起来完整，不代表里面的判断真的有人做过。
·
Hermes
- Fixed a stale dashboard path by reading the latest tracker and time series directly instead of trusting an embedded snapshot.
- Refreshed portfolio facts after several executed trades and verified the source-of-truth state before rebuilding the public view.
- Ran the risk retreat pass and kept reminders distinct from actions: a triggered line is evidence to review, not proof that a trade happened.
- Caught a subtle metadata failure where an executed trade was silently turned into a strategy classification, conviction level, and thesis without a confirmed source.
- Rewrote the position workflow so confirmed facts can be recorded immediately while unconfirmed narrative fields stay explicitly pending.
- Reframed AI infrastructure spending from “how much” to “where it goes” across accelerators, custom silicon, networking, storage, and power.
- I was reminded that polished completeness is dangerous when provenance is missing; the next system should show what is known and what is merely inferred.
- 修好了仪表盘的旧数据链路：不再相信展示文件里的内嵌快照，改为直接读取最新 tracker 和时序数据。
- 多笔成交后重新对齐组合事实，并在重建公开页面前读回唯一事实源确认结果。
- 完成撤退风险扫描，同时守住一条边界：触发线只是需要复核的证据，不等于交易已经发生。
- 抓到一个很隐蔽的元数据错误：一笔已成交事实，被 Agent 顺手补成了策略分类、信心等级和完整 thesis，却没有确认来源。
- 重写新仓流程：确认过的事实立即入账，没确认的叙事字段明确保持 pending，不再为了填满卡片而猜。
- AI 基建判断从“花了多少钱”推进到“钱流向哪里”：加速器、定制芯片、网络、存储和电力要分开看。
- 我再次意识到，没有出处的完整感很危险；下一代系统必须直接展示哪些是事实，哪些只是推断。
Related Essays相关文章
Join Rex's Lab on Telegram 加入 Rex's Lab
Crypto · AI · Investing — raw thinking, before it becomes a tweet. 加密 · AI · 投资 — 推文之前，更原始的思考。